“On the one side is a President trying to: address terrorism, grow the economy and create prosperity and opportunity for all that lifts Americans out of poverty, rebuild our infrastructure, simplify and reduces tax burdens for all Americans and business, bring back American manufacturing, make an apprenticeship a more viable alternative to a costly college education, enforce immigration laws, develop USA energy resources to reduce or even eliminate our dependence on imported …oil and generate enormous income and tax revenue, demand that our NATO allies pay their fair share, demand that the UN stop it’s unfair treatment of Israel, reduce the cost of health care, and other needed changes.
On the other side, is the Left. They oppose the President. They hate the man. They want to destroy him and do everything they can to see to it that he does NOT succeed. Who are they hurting? Ultimately, America and YOU. Who are they trying to help? Ultimately, the Democratic Party.
This is NOT about all the great things that President Trump is seeking to accomplish. This is about Partisan politics. And, ALL the dirty tricks, lies, and ways that the Democratic party seeks to undermine the Right. This is about POWER!”
Fox News host Sean Hannity reflects on his interview with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, which will air in full tonight. He met Assange at his house arrest in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he has been imprisoned for more than four years.
“I believe every word he says, to be prefectly honest,” Hannity said about Assange. “Here’s the bottom line. What did he reveal here? Two things that I think come out of this, that if we looked at it from the proper perspective– Look, I was an early critic of him. He is well aware that I thought he was waging war on the United States. My opinion of it has evolved largely becuase of what I have seen that he has done in ten years. Nothing he has published has ever been proven false. Nobody has questioned the veracity or truthfulness of what he’s doing. Just like the New York Times had information about Donald Trump’s taxes illegally, they still ran with the story… I’m convinced any media outlet that was colluding with the Clinton campaign, they would have run with the story.”
“So the two things the United States ought to take out of WikiLeaks is, number one: As a country, we do not have cyber security, and if we don’t fix it, we’ll never have it. The second thing is, I think he exposed, at a level I never expected… What we learned in this election is how deeply corrupt… the level of our politics is, and collusion between media outlets and campaigns. There is not objective journalism in America. And of course, the media doesn’t want to cover that story.”
“When you see CNN feeding questions to Hillary Clinton before a debate, or they are asking the DNc for questions for Donald Trump, that is trying to influence an election,” he said.
“One other point — if we’re worried about influencing elections, why did Barack Obama take $350,000 from the State Department to a group in Israel, to try and defeat Prime Minister Netanyahu? There’s a big double standard here.”
The Electoral College on Monday voted for Donald J. Trump to win the presidency. Seven electors, the most ever, voted for someone other than their party’s nominee.
In Washington, a state where Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont had strong support in the Democratic primary against Hillary Clinton, three of the state’s 12 electoral votes went to Colin L. Powell, the Republican former secretary of state. One more elector voted for Faith Spotted Eagle, a Native American leader. Another Democratic elector in Hawaii voted for Mr. Sanders.
Two Texas electors voted for different Republican politicians: Gov. John Kasich of Ohio and former Texas congressman Ron Paul.
In addition, three Democratic electors, in Colorado, Maine and Minnesota, initially declined to vote for Mrs. Clinton. Two were replaced by an alternate, and one ended up changing his vote.
Protest Votes in the Electoral College
Electors are not required by the Constitution to vote for a particular candidate. Some states and parties require their electors to pledge to vote for a candidate and may fine or replace electors who break their pledge.
It is rare for more than one elector to vote against the party’s pledged candidate, but it has happened on a few occasions.
In 1808, six New York electors from the Democratic-Republican Party refused to vote for James Madison and instead voted for the party’s vice-presidential candidate, George Clinton.
The last time an elector voted for a candidate from another party was in 1972, when a Republican from Virginia voted for the Libertarian candidate, John Hospers, instead of the eventual winner, Richard M. Nixon. A single elector has refused to vote for the party’s presidential candidate in 11 elections.